Skip to main content
Advanced Search
Search Terms
Content Type

Exact Matches
Tag Searches
Date Options
Updated after
Updated before
Created after
Created before

Search Results

395 total results found

At what age is a sociotype formed?

Socionics Questions & debatable topics

According to Aushra Augustinavichiute A child's IM code, i.e. his/her personality type, is formed up to the age of 5 under the influence of interaction of IM codes of people close to the child. Later on, the presence of people with compatible or conflicting...

Socionics
Status
Completed?

Can the sociotype change?

Socionics Questions & debatable topics

According to Victor Gulenko The actual sociotype is the deep nucleus. Its structure does not change during life (maximum stiffness and stability). The term of its existence is equal to the time of the existence of the psychic system itself. Thus, the socion...

Status
Completed?
Socionics

True Neutral

Moral Alignments Moral Alignments

True Neutral is one of the 9 alignments.  True Neutral otherwise known as "Neutral Neutral" or "Neutral" is an alignment that falls in the center of both spectrums.      Lawful        Good Neutral        Neutral Chaotic        Evil As shown above, a true N...

Status
Not Yet Started

Social 1 In Detail

Enneagram The Twenty-Seven Subtypes

Anger in the Social Sphere Ironic thing that happens when you mix the Anger of the E1 with the instinct of adaptation, you get a character whose main characteristic is non-adaptability. These people have difficulty of going along with social customs and behav...

Status
In Progress
Enneagram

Lawful Good

Moral Alignments Moral Alignments

A lawful good type is someone who is rule abiding and often times will go out of their way to help people.  The lawful represents how they will always listen to the rules and take matter with caution while the good represents how they will do good things rathe...

Status
Not Yet Started

1 vs 3

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Claudio Naranjo's types Anger vs Vanity E1 is restrained and serious; E3 is expansive and cheerful.[1] E1 is more tradition directed; E3, other-directed.[1] E1 is a perfecter from morality; E3 is a self-perfecter from doing.[2] References [1] Naranjo...

Status
In Progress
Enneagram

1 vs 4

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Claudio Naranjo's types Anger vs Envy   References

Status
Not Yet Started
Enneagram

1 vs 5

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Claudio Naranjo's types Anger vs Avarice E1 is aversive to pleasure; E5 appears as having a diminished capacity to experience pleasure.[1] E1 identifies more with the dignified; E5 identifies more with the guilty sub-self.[1] E1 is assertive and straight...

Status
In Progress
Enneagram

1 vs 7

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out

Status
In Progress
Enneagram

1 vs 9

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out

Status
In Progress
Enneagram

2 | 6

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Claudio Naranjo's types Pride | Fear Self-Preservation E2's fear mainly manifests in relationships; in E6 the emphasis is on a more generalized fear.[1] References [1] Naranjo, C. (2020). Psicología de los eneatipos: Or...

Status
In Progress
Enneagram

2 | 4

Enneagram Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Claudio Naranjo's types Pride | Envy E2 uses pride to get love and not to be abandoned, unlike E4.[1] Self-Preservation E2 represses his needs and feelings and focus on others more than E4 does.[1] Sexual E2 is the most e...

Enneagram
Status
In Progress

ILE | SEI

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and SEI by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and SEI by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics

ILE | ESE

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and ESE by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and ESE by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics

ILE | LII

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and LII by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and LII by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics

ILE | SLE

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and SLE by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and SLE by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Socionics
Status
In Progress

ILE | IEI

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and SEI by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and SEI by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics

ILE | EIE

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and EIE by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and EIE by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics

ILE | LSI

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and LSI by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and LSI by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics

ILE | SEE

Socionics Differentiation of types

Feel free to fill this page out Compare ILE and SEE by Small Groups (definitions by Gulenko, Romanov and Prokofieva) Compare ILE and SEE by Cognitive Functions (Model G)

Status
In Progress
Socionics